- Date posted
- 25w
- User type
- OCD Conqueror
- Date posted
- 25w
I think this is a great question. To me I see it less of reassurance and more of a reminder that I’m not damned to hell because an immoral thought popped in my head. So the thoughts and urges are OCD but my responses to those thoughts and urges are more “me.” Untreated, or before NOCD therapy, I would have said that both the thoughts/urges and the compulsion/response were both me, but I see more nuance now. Thank you for the thought provoking post. I’m curious what others might think.
- User type
- OCD Conqueror
- Date posted
- 25w
It's definitely a fine line between awareness and reassurance! Thanks for sharing
- Date posted
- 25w
I feel like its reassurance but im sure ive posted that too!
- User type
- OCD Conqueror
- Date posted
- 25w
Oh I definitely have as well! Thanks for sharing your opinion
- Date posted
- 25w
For me personally at least, knowing that this thoughts ARE pretty much caused by OCD help me on my way of recovery, even if it may be hard to internalise at the beginning. I think some form of assurance for people suffering from OCD is needed, so a reminder like that isn't bad per se. Because really, with some of the themes you can't just simply say that they might be true - we know that they aren't and the disorder is causing our doubts. But seeing these thoughts for what they truly are: a non-existent threat that keeps plaguing our mind, causing to engage in compulsions because well, we are trying to solve something that's not there, is really helpful. "Maybe, maybe not" works, but I feel like instead of accepting that you may be your fear, this excercise is meant to rather make these thoughts seems as unimportant.
- Date posted
- 25w
Hi anon, I believe anything can be reassurance yet depends on the person how they would intake and make actions on it. OCD does require awareness so sometimes it causes one to seek out alternative perspectives in order to gain more information to realize it is a common barrier to help self identify. So there's assurance which is gaining info to get new terminology and parameters to see if it aligns with ones struggles, accomplishment, and values to then be able to make one's own conclusion what parts to learn and keep or omit. Reassurance is asking the same question or thought despite having an answer to oneself or getting answers already. Example "What makes this OCD" helps gain facts yet relies on the poster to decide which facts is relevant such as maybe it is OCD but it's more about perfection OCD yet not as much about relationship OCD, then continue to sit with that emotion with less confusion being stuck on what they were even feeling. The other example is "what if it's me? I know i keep asking but I want to know more" this is seeking all or continuous facts and opinions externally without no real stopping point boundary being established. It's okay to get assured, just people with OCD has to work a little harder to be cautious and aware if they are offsetting to rely on the dopamine to ignore feelings and chase comfort versus gaining perspective that may give some relief yet continue to face their fears. OCD may be a part of your habits but not you if it makes sense. OCD can act like a friend that cares but isn't a good friend. It's a duality of having both the knowledge and reminder of the practice it's from you yet a disordered moment of you.
- Date posted
- 25w
This is definitely reassurance! I try to comment something closer to, "Maybe this is OCD, maybe it's not. You'll be okay either way."
- Date posted
- 25w
Thanks for a thought-provoking post! I think “it’s just OCD” is helpful when people are spiraling about not whether it’s OCD or not, but when they are stuck in a loop and don’t realize it. For example, should I confess XYZ or not? That’s not the right question. Trying to get someone to realize that they’re trying to solve a problem that isn’t solvable, that their ruminating about whether to confess or not IS the problem. But yeah, posts where we’re being asked if it’s OCD or not and we tell them it’s just OCD, I’d say that’s giving reassurance. I mean, really, we’d have to report 50% or more of posts on here for reassurance-seeking. But this community has a lot of empathy. We know how lonely and scary and isolating it can be and when people reach out, we try to respond. And some people are just figuring out they have OCD and don’t understand that they’re asking for reassurance. It seems they come here to know they’re not alone and that someone understands them. We’re walking this fine line between making sure people feel heard and not enabling their OCD.
Related posts
- Date posted
- 24w
With ocd can the thoughts themselves feel entirely true???? Or is it just the narrative around the thought that feels true/real?
- Date posted
- 21w
I’ve been getting stuck in my understanding of OCD lately. When I have intrusive thoughts, although I have OCD, I’m not supposed to label them as part of my condition? Instead I just say maybe/maybe not? It feels like it takes the wind out of my sails a bit in recovery? Like having cancer, but when I go to chemo, I’m supposed to say “maybe I have cancer, maybe I don’t.” Would anyone be able to speak to this and increase my insight and understanding? Thank you!
- Date posted
- 19w
The subject of OCD matters to the sufferer because it feels like confirmation that they are fundamentally unlovable and unwanted—as if even existence itself doesn’t want them. They feel like an error, carrying a deep sense of guilt and shame, as if they were inherently wrong. They suffer from low self-esteem and a deep internalized shame, because long ago, they were fragmented and learned a pattern of fundamental distrust—especially self-distrust. But the real trouble doesn’t come from the content of the most vile or taboo thoughts. It comes from the fact that the sufferer lacks self-love. That’s why, when you begin to walk the road to recovery, you’re taught unconditional self-acceptance—because that’s what all sufferers of OCD have in common: if you aren’t 100% sure, if there isn’t absolute certainty, the doubt will continue to attack you and your core values. It will make you doubt everything—even your own aversion to the thoughts. You have to relearn how to trust yourself—not because you accept that you might become a murderer someday—but because you enter a deep state of acceptance about who you truly are. It’s not about becoming a monster at all. It’s about making peace with what lies at the root of the fear. Making peace with the guilt. With the shame. Making peace with yourself and the person you fear you might be. Because that fear is not rooted in reality. It’s not rooted in any true desire to act. It’s rooted in your identity—specifically, in what might threaten it. That’s what confirms the belief that you are fundamentally wrong. And OCD fuels that belief by using intrusive taboo thoughts to attack your very sense of self. But then I wonder: let’s say, for example, someone fears being or becoming a sexually dangerous person—how could that person practice unconditional self-acceptance? I would never accept myself if I were to harm anyone—the thought alone makes me want to cry. I know it’s not about whether or not someone acts on the thought. It’s about the core fear underneath it. So how do you accept yourself when the thoughts—and the feelings around them—feel so completely unacceptable ?
Be a part of the largest OCD Community
Share your thoughts so the Community can respond